×
Donations ~ 2017

Donations are directed to server maintenance and upgrades, still trying to think of something special to offer if we reach our modest goal.
Please indicate via email or private message whether or not you would like your username, real name or initials (default) listed here.
Click 'Read more' to view donors list.

Truth About The Paris Climate Accord

  • 300
  • 300's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Addicted to Freedom
  • Addicted to Freedom
More
3 weeks 5 days ago #145052 by 300
300 created the topic: Truth About The Paris Climate Accord

Once you have seen the strings of the marionettes, you can NEVER watch the pantomime the same way again.
Ephesians 5:11

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • 300
  • 300's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Addicted to Freedom
  • Addicted to Freedom
More
3 weeks 5 days ago #145053 by 300
300 replied the topic: Truth About The Paris Climate Accord

Once you have seen the strings of the marionettes, you can NEVER watch the pantomime the same way again.
Ephesians 5:11

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • 300
  • 300's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Addicted to Freedom
  • Addicted to Freedom
More
3 weeks 5 days ago #145054 by 300
300 replied the topic: Truth About The Paris Climate Accord
NASA Data Proves Trump Right to Exit Paris Climate Accord

Paris accord meant to kill US economy to make America dependent on globalism
June 2, 2017

Nasa’s own data backs President Trump’s decision to pull out of the Paris climate agreement, despite the agency’s politicized leaders claiming otherwise.

Additionally, recent Canadian Ice Service data shows Greenland ice nearing a record high as Arctic sea ice extends over 300,000 square miles past its 2016 levels.

“The useful idiots in the press who report on climate, continue to insist that the Arctic is melting down and nearing catastrophe,” wrote climate analyst Tony Heller. “In the actual Arctic, sea ice extent is normal and Greenland has gained a record amount of ice this winter.”

In 2015, a NASA study showed that Antarctic sheet ice was expanding, refuting claims by global warming advocates that polar ice would soon disappear.

“A new NASA study says that an increase in Antarctic snow accumulation that began 10,000 years ago is currently adding enough ice to the continent to outweigh the increased losses from its thinning glaciers,” the agency admitted. “The research challenges the conclusions of other studies, including the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) 2013 report, which says that Antarctica is overall losing land ice.”

“According to the new analysis of satellite data, the Antarctic ice sheet showed a net gain of 112 billion tons of ice a year from 1992 to 2001. That net gain slowed to 82 billion tons of ice per year between 2003 and 2008.”

Furthermore, there is no such thing as man-made global warming drastically melting ice in the Antarctic, according to analysis of Antarctic expeditions from the early 20th century.


When the current sea ice extent in Antarctica is superimposed over past routes of expedition ships, it reveals that ice on the frigid continent is largely the same now as it was when Sir Ernest Shackleton led his crew through hundreds of miles of ice in 1915.

It really shouldn’t be surprising then that it’s mainly politicians – and establishment scientists receiving grants from those politicians – who are furious at President Trump for pulling out of the Paris climate agreement.

“This further demonstrates that the global warming created by man is just a fraud to get more taxes,” reported Zero Hedge. “Scientists have looked over the logbooks of polar explorers Robert Falcon Scott and Ernest Shackleton from their expeditions during 1901-1904 and 1907-1909.”

“The theory that sea ice has declined post-1950 because of man cannot be supported.”

Additionally, the sun is reaching a solar minimum, which indicate the Earth is entering a global cooling phase, and perhaps even a mini ice age.

“The longest minimum on record, the Maunder Minimum of 1645-1715, lasted an incredible 70 years,” reported the Global Warming Policy Forum. “It caused London’s River Thames to freeze over, and ‘frost fairs’ became popular.

“This period of solar inactivity also corresponds to a climatic period called the ‘Little Ice Age’ when rivers that are normally ice-free froze and snow fields remained year-round at lower altitudes.”

The goal of the Paris climate agreement is entirely political: the globalists are trying to scare the world’s population into believing “global warming” is too big of a threat for their country to handle alone and thus it can only be “defeated” through the expansion of the UN and other unelected, global bureaucracies at the expense of their nation’s sovereignty.

It also allows globalists to control world economies from the top-down by intentionally handicapping productive countries, such as the US, from gaining too much prosperity and thus independence from global bodies.

In particular, the Paris climate agreement would prevent the US from regaining its economic might by burdening companies and average Americans with overzealous “climate change” regulations which aren’t fully enforced on China and numerous third-world nations.

It would put the US at a severe disadvantage it could never recover from.

In short, “man-made climate change” is an manufactured problem exaggerated by the government to instigate a public reaction – fear – the government then exploits to offer a predetermined solution: the expansion of government at the public’s expense.

The global elite are currently meeting at the Bilderberg conference in Chantilly, Virginia, to discuss ways to undermine President Trump’s decision to pull out of the Paris agreement.

The Bilderberg Group was one of the primary global bodies responsible for orchestrating the “global warming” agenda to marginalize independent nation-states.




Arctic Sea Ice Bounces Back & Greenland Ice Nears Record High
Arctic Sea Ice extent is 800,000 km2 higher than it was in 2016.
Winter snow and ice cover trend for the Northern Hemisphere has in fact been trending upwards since statistics started. And when one applies the 30-year weather mean used to define climate, the winter trend since 1987 is strongly upwards. So is the autumn trend. This 2017 winter was well above average, ranking in the top 10.
The vast majority area of Greenland has seen surface snow and ice gain over the past 9 months. Moreover, Arctic temperatures for now are below normal…The big development in recent Arctic news is the “recovery” of Arctic sea ice extent, which now is back in the normal range.

Once you have seen the strings of the marionettes, you can NEVER watch the pantomime the same way again.
Ephesians 5:11

This message has an attachment image.
Please log in or register to see it.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • 300
  • 300's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Addicted to Freedom
  • Addicted to Freedom
More
3 weeks 4 days ago #145057 by 300
300 replied the topic: Truth About The Paris Climate Accord
Studying the Climate Doesn't Make You an Expert on Economics and Politics
Ryan McMaken

In response to the Trump administration's announcement that it was pulling out of the Paris Climate Accord, some of his critics declared that anyone who likes "science" would have supported the accord.

Not surprisingly, Neil deGrasse Tyson rushed to declare that Trump supported the withdrawal because his administration "never learned what Science is or how and why it works."

But what does "Science" (which Tyson capitalizes for some reason) have to do with it?

We know that Tyson is of the opinion that there is global warming. We also know that many other physical scientists agree with him.

But, it does not follow logically that agreeing with Tyson on the matter of climate change must necessarily mean supporting the Paris Climate Agreement.

After all, the Paris Climate Agreement isn't a scientific study. It's a political document that lays out a specific public-policy agenda.

Agreement or disagreement with the accord might hint at one's opinions about climate science. Or it might not. One can agree that climate change exists and that human beings have a large role in the phenomenon. Agreement on this matter, however, does not dictate that one must also agree with the political policies outlined in the Paris document.

The two are totally independent phenomena.
Science and Politics Are Not the Same Thing

An analogy might help illustrate further:

Scientific inquiry tells us that obesity is bad for one's health. Let's imagine then, that in response to rising obesity rates, a large number of politicians gather and sign an agreement — let's call it the London Obesity Avoidance Deal (LOAD). The supporting politicians claim that the deal will reduce obesity and that failure to abide by the agreement will spell a health crisis for humanity.

Does this mean, then, that any politician who doesn't sign onto the agreement is an "obesity denier"? Does a failure to approve of the agreement prove that the dissenters believe that obesity is not a real thing?

Obviously not.

Those who refuse to sign the agreement may be of the opinion that the LOAD does little to actually reduce obesity. Or, the dissenters may feel that the deal fails to properly compare costs and benefits when imposing its directives. Opponents may feel that "the cure is worse than the disease."

In any case, dissent from the deal has nothing to do with denying the existence of obesity or the science behind the studies on the matter.
The Problem with Paris

The same is true of the Paris deal. Those who disagree with it may very well be — and probably are — taking issue with the specific provisions of the deal which may actually prove to be more costly to people than the presumed global warming itself.

But, for physicists like Tyson — i.e., people who know nothing about economics or political institutions — public policy is like a magic trick. A group of politicians get together, declare that they're going to solve problem X, and then problem X is magically solved, so long as everyone supports the "solution."

But what if the policy prescriptions of the Paris politicians are wrong? Or, what if the cure is worse than the disease?

Presumably, the agreement is supposed to improve the lives of real-world human beings by improving their standards of living.

If this is true, then, the Paris agreement must accomplish several things:

1. It must rely on good science about the climate.



2. It must accurately predict the effects of climate change on standards of living.



3. It must endorse public policies that will do something to mitigate the negative effects of climate change on standards of living.



4. It must demonstrate that these public policies will in fact mitigate the effects of climate change.



5. The agreement must demonstrate that the costs of the proposed public policies themselves are lower than the costs of the climate change.

If the Paris agreement fails to do any of these things, it should be rejected. If the net effect of the agreement is to make people poorer, then the agreement is of no value.

Now, without making any judgment about climate science itself, we can see just from looking at the Paris agreement that it could easily be rejected on the basis of numbers two, three, four, and five in our list.

After all, the agreement is based on policy predictions that are wildly speculative.They attempt to make predictions about the global economy decades in the future (a notoriously unreliable endeavor) and they fail to honestly take into account the true costs of imposing far-higher energy costs on most of the world's poor and working classes — which is what the agreement would do.

In fact, the agreement doesn't even mention the cost to households that would face higher energy costs under the agreement. The only costs mentioned are the costs of adapting to climate change. In other words, the agreement assumes that there is no downside for households in the agreement's provisions. That's a huge red flag right there.

Also ignored is the opportunity cost of adopting the agreement's provisions. In real life, adoption of the agreement's policy prescriptions will lessen growth by reducing access to basic energy resources. In addition to reducing household wealth, this will also reduce tax revenues. Money spent on higher energy costs is money that can't be spent elsewhere — on things like health care, and research into better agricultural practices. Yet, at the same time, the agreement calls for massive redistribution of wealth and large amounts of government spending on various programs such as "emergency preparedness" and more government "insurance" to pay for the effects of natural disasters.

Thus, the agreement calls for more spending, while reducing the ability of both the public and private sectors to engage in that spending. It's a self-defeating endeavor.

Other opportunity costs include the impact on the production of fresh water. As I noted in a 2015 article:

A second major factor here in the necessity of energy is fresh water. The California drought has reminded us that fresh water is a scarce resource, even if the government likes to treat it as if it were not. But even as larger populations demand more water, fresh water can be produced through the use of energy via desalinization and pump-based aqueducts.



Today, most such schemes are still uneconomical because the problem of water scarcity can usually be solved through cheaper means such as importing food from wetter climates and through cheaper aqueduct systems that are primarily gravity-based.



In the future, however, as water does become more and more scarce as populations grow, the most practical answer will indeed become more energy-intensive solutions.



By centrally planning and artificially limiting energy usage, however, what the global warming lobby wants to do is raise the price of water processing, and by limiting the use of such methods, also inhibit technological progress by preventing practical experience in the use of water processing and fresh water production.

The Paris Climate Agreement supporters will no doubt retort that the provisions of the agreement will somehow amazingly prevent the need for more spending on clean water in the future by reducing global temperatures. Based on what evidence? Based on a computer model for what will happen decades from now?

With such flimsy evidence, it's easy to see that it might be wiser to stick with policies we have now that are likely to produce a bird in hand — rather than the two birds in the bush merely promised by the Paris agreement.

We already know we can help the poor now with cheap energy, more productive capacity, and a robust economy. The Paris agreement only promises to help hypothetical people in the future based on a theoretical and untried public policy regime.

Many prudent people will elect to go with the former.

Moreover, many of the global warming lobby's own people deny that the Paris agreement does much of anything to reduce temperatures anyway. Thus, prudence would dictate a renewed interest in investing in technologies and poverty-relief measures (such as those that encourage more trade and capital investment) that we know will help the poor right now. Adopting policies that cripple our ability to invest in these measures — as the Paris agreement does — only makes matters worse.

Nevertheless, in the imaginary world of physicists and climate scientists who can't comprehend the complicated realities of economics and public policy, simply wishing something to be so makes it so. If we just wish really hard that all our problems are solved, surely the good people in government will make it happen.

Once you have seen the strings of the marionettes, you can NEVER watch the pantomime the same way again.
Ephesians 5:11

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • 300
  • 300's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Addicted to Freedom
  • Addicted to Freedom
More
3 weeks 4 days ago #145059 by 300
300 replied the topic: Truth About The Paris Climate Accord
Macrocosmic Influences On Global Climate Change Documented By Russian Scientists

January 8, 1998

PLANETOPHYSICAL STATE OF

THE EARTH AND LIFE

By DR. ALEXEY N. DMITRIEV*


Published in Russian, IICA Transactions, Volume 4, 1997


*Professor of Geology and Mineralogy, and Chief Scientific Member,

United Institute of Geology, Geophysics, and Mineralogy,

Siberian Department of Russian Academy of Sciences.

Expert on Global Ecology, and Fast -Processing Earth Events.

Russian to English Translation and Editing:

by A. N. Dmitriev, Andrew Tetenov, and Earl L. Crockett


Published in Russian, IICA Transactions, Volume 4, 1997



*Professor of Geology and Mineralogy, and Chief Scientific Member,

United Institute of Geology, Geophysics, and Mineralogy,

Siberian Department of Russian Academy of Sciences.

Expert on Global Ecology, and Fast -Processing Earth Events.



Russian to English Translation and Editing:

by A. N. Dmitriev, Andrew Tetenov, and Earl L. Crockett



Summary Paragraph

Current PlanetoPhysical alterations of the Earth are becoming irreversible. Strong evidence exists that these transformations are being caused by highly charged material and energetic non-uniformity’s in anisotropic interstellar space which have broken into the interplanetary area of our Solar System. This “donation” of energy is producing hybrid processes and excited energy states in all planets, as well as the Sun. Effects here on Earth are to be found in the acceleration of the magnetic pole shift, in the vertical and horizontal ozone content distribution, and in the increased frequency and magnitude of significant catastrophic climatic events. There is growing probability that we are moving into a rapid temperature instability period similar to the one that took place 10,000 years ago. The adaptive responses of the biosphere, and humanity, to these new conditions may lead to a total global revision of the range of species and life on Earth. It is only through a deep understanding of the fundamental changes taking place in the natural environment surrounding us that politicians, and citizens a like, will be able to achieve balance with the renewing flow of PlanetoPhysical states and processes.

INTRODUCTION
Current, in process, geological, geophysical, and climatical alterations of the Earth are becoming more, and more, irreversible. At the present time researchers are revealing some of the causes which are leading to a general reorganization of the electro-magnetosphere (the electromagnetic skeleton) of our planet, and of its climatic machinery. A greater number of specialists in climatology, geophysics, planetophysics, and heliophysics are tending towards a cosmic causative sequence version for what is happening. Indeed, events of the last decade give strong evidence of unusually significant heliospheric and planetophysic transformations [1,2]. Given the quality, quantity, and scale of these transformations we may say that:

The climatic and biosphere processes here on Earth (through a tightly connected feedback system) are directly impacted by, and linked back to, the general overall transformational processes taking place in our Solar System. We must begin to organize our attention and thinking to understand that climatic changes on Earth are only one part, or link, in a whole chain of events taking place in our Heliosphere.

These deep physical processes, these new qualities of our physical and geological environment, will impose special adaptive challenges and requirements for all life forms on Earth. Considering the problems of adaptation our biosphere will have with these new physical conditions on Earth, we need to distinguish the general tendency and nature of the changes. As we will show below,these tendencies may be traced in the direction of planet energy capacity growth (capacitance), which is leading to a highly excited or charged state of some of Earth’s systems.The most intense transformations are taking place in the planetary gas-plasma envelopes to which the productive possibilities of our biosphere are timed. Currently this new scenario of excess energy run-off is being formed, and observed:

In the ionosphere by plasma generation.

In the magnetosphere by magnetic storms.

In the atmosphere by cyclones.

This high-energy atmospheric phenomena, which was rare in the past, is now becoming more frequent, intense, and changed in its nature. The material composition of the gas-plasma envelope is also being transformed.

It is quite natural for the whole biota of the Earth to be subjected to these changing conditions of the electromagnetic field, and to the significant deep alterations of Earth’s climatic machinery. These fundamental processes of change create a demand within all of Earth’s life organisms for new forms of adaptation. The natural development of these new forms may lead to a total global revision of the range of species, and life, on Earth . New deeper qualities of life itself may come forth, bringing the new physical state of the Earth to an equilibrium with the new organismic possibilities of development, reproduction, and perfection. In this sense it is evident that we are faced with a problem of the adaptation of humanity to this new state of the Earth; new conditions on Earth whose biospheric qualities are varying, and non-uniformly distributed. Therefore the current period of transformation is transient, and the transition of life’s representatives to the future may take place only after a deep evaluation of what it will take to comply with these new Earthly biospheric conditions. Each living representative on Earth will be getting a thorough “examination,” or “quality control inspection,” to determine it’s ability to comply with these new conditions.These evolutionary challenges always require effort, or endurance, be it individual organisms, species, or communities. Therefore, it is not only the climate that is becoming new, but we as human beings are experiencing a global change in the vital processes of living organisms, or life itself; which is yet another link in the total process. We cannot treat such things separately, or individually.

Once you have seen the strings of the marionettes, you can NEVER watch the pantomime the same way again.
Ephesians 5:11

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • 300
  • 300's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Addicted to Freedom
  • Addicted to Freedom
More
3 weeks 4 days ago #145060 by 300
300 replied the topic: Truth About The Paris Climate Accord
1.0 TRANSFORMATION OF THE SOLAR SYSTEM
tmgnow.com/repository/global/planetophysical1.html

2.0 THE EARTH REORGANIZATION PROCESSES
tmgnow.com/repository/global/planetophysical2.html

3.0 THE ARRIVAL OF NEW CONDITIONS AND CONSEQUENCES
tmgnow.com/repository/global/planetophysical3.html


CONCLUSIONS

The situation that has been created here in our Heliosphere is of external, Interstellar, cosmic space origin,and is herein assumed to be caused by the underlying fundamental auto-oscillation, space-physical, processes of continuous creation that has shaped, and continues to evolve our Universe. The present excited state of our Heliosphere exists within the whole, or entire, organism that makes up the Solar System; the Sun, Planets, Moons, Comets, and Asteroids, as well as the plasmas, and/or electromagnetic mediums, and structures, of Interplanetary Space. The response to these Interstellar energy and matter injections into our Heliosphere has been, and continues to be, a series of newly observed energetic processes and formations on all of the Planets; between the Planets and their Moons, and the Planets and the Sun.

Earth's ability to adapt to these external actions and transference's is aggravated, made more difficult, by the technogeneous alterations we have made to the natural quality, or state, of our geological-geophysical environment. Our Planet Earth is now in the process of a dramatic transformation;by altering the electromagnetic skeleton through a shift of the geomagnetic field poles, and through compositional changes in the ozone, and hydrogen, saturation levels of its gas-plasma envelopes. These changes in the Earth's physical state are being accompanied by resultant climatic/atmospheric, and biospheric, adaptation processes. These processes are becoming more and more intense, and frequent, as evidenced by the real time increase in "non-periodic transient events"; ie., catastrophes. There are reasons favoring, or pointing to, the fact that a growth in the ethical, or spiritual quality, of humanity would decrease the number and intensity of complex catastrophes. It has become vitally important that a world chart be prepared setting forth the favorable, and the catastrophic, regions on Earth taking into account the quality of the geologic-geophysical environment, the variety and intensity of cosmic influences, and the real level of spiritual-ethical development of the people occupying those areas.

It is reasonable to point out that our Planet will soon be experiencing these new conditions of growing energy signifying the transition into a new state and quality of Space-Earth relationship. The living organisms of those regions of Earth having the major "inlets", or attractions, for cosmic influences will be taking the lead in evolving life's appropriate reactions, or processes, to these new conditions. These zones of vertical commutations and energy transfers are already becoming the heart, or hotbeds, in the search for new systems of adaptation and mutual transformation. The general list of these zones includes the polar regions, the eastern continental extremities of the equatorial regions [Caribbean, Madagascar, Philippines, Yellow Sea, etc.], and the inner continental zones tending to folding and uplifting [Himalayas, Pamir-Hindukush, Altay-Sayan systems, etc.]

The most significant of these areas are the helio-sensitive zones which have intense responses to geoeffective solar activities [Note #1]; responses that include the very dramatic and unusual manifestation of non-homogeneous vacuum, or classical non-mechanical ether, domain structures. These structures, or objects, then interact with the heliosensitive zones producing deep and powerful effects upon the environment such as the alteration of seismic activities, and chemical compositions. Because these non-homogeneous vacuum domain objects display not-of-this-physical-world characteristics such as "liquid light" and "non-Newtonian movement" it is difficult not to describe their manifestations as being "interworld processes". It is important to note that those heliosensitive zones that exhibit middle and large scale processes are also those that are closely associated with these "interworld processes" produced by physical vacuum homogeneity disturbances.

Such disturbances cause, and create, energy and matter transfer processes between the ether media and our three-dimensional world. The multitude of such phenomena, which is rich in it's quality and variety, is already growing quickly. Hundreds of thousands of these natural self-luminous formations are exerting a increasing influence upon Earth's geophysic fields and biosphere. We suggest that the presence of these formations is the mainstream precedent to the transformation of Earth;an Earth which becomes more and more subject to the transitional physical processes which exist within the borderland between the physical vacuum and our material world.

All of this places humanity, and each one of us, squarely in front of a very difficult and topical problem; the creation of a revolutionary advancement in knowledge which will require a transformation of our thinking and being equal to this never-before-seen phenomena now presencing itself in our world. There is no other path to the future than a profound internal experiential perception and knowledge of the events now underway in the natural environment that surrounds us. It is only through this understanding that humanity will achieve balance with the renewing flow of the PlanetoPhysical States and Processes.

End Paper

Once you have seen the strings of the marionettes, you can NEVER watch the pantomime the same way again.
Ephesians 5:11

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • 300
  • 300's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Addicted to Freedom
  • Addicted to Freedom
More
3 weeks 4 days ago #145061 by 300
300 replied the topic: Truth About The Paris Climate Accord
And then there is this:
Geoengineering Is The Primary Cause Of Global Climate Change, Not CO2
stateofthenation2012.com/?p=27876

:huh:

Once you have seen the strings of the marionettes, you can NEVER watch the pantomime the same way again.
Ephesians 5:11

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • 300
  • 300's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Addicted to Freedom
  • Addicted to Freedom
More
3 weeks 4 days ago - 3 weeks 4 days ago #145064 by 300
300 replied the topic: Truth About The Paris Climate Accord
Clearly.



A Day of Beijing Air Can Be Deadlier than 40 Cigarettes








Once you have seen the strings of the marionettes, you can NEVER watch the pantomime the same way again.
Ephesians 5:11

This message has attachments images.
Please log in or register to see it.

Last Edit: 3 weeks 4 days ago by 300.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • 300
  • 300's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Addicted to Freedom
  • Addicted to Freedom
More
3 weeks 3 days ago #145066 by 300
300 replied the topic: Truth About The Paris Climate Accord
Why climate changes
Milankovitch cycles
There are three interacting, astronomical cycles in the earth's orbit around the sun: in the shape of the elliptical orbit (about 95,000 years), in the axis of rotation (about 42,000 years), and in the date of perihelion—the time of year when the earth is closest to the sun—(about 21,000 years). Building on the theory of Milankovitch (1930), a link has been established between these variations and long-term climatic change. Glacial conditions, for example, are favored by conditions of small axial tilt, and perihelion in the Northern winter.
Put simply, earth’s variation in its axis of rotation combined with its relation to the sun has major climate consequences and this causes the Northern Hemisphere to get colder at times. Sometimes it gets colder for a long time. When this happens we get an ice age or a glaciation maximum. The last glaciation maximum (LGM) occurred about twelve to eighteen thousand years ago. Mankind has absolutely zero input in these cycles.
. It has been discovered that the earth’s magnetic north pole is migrating toward Russia at about 40 miles a year. The magnetic north pole stayed pretty much where it was first discovered in 1831 but in 1904, scientists discovered it was moving northeastward at about 9 miles a year. Its migration sped up in 1989 and then again in 2007 to its present rate of 40 miles a year and could be shifting even faster.
To be clear, this is the “magnetic” pole. It is not the axis around which the earth rotates. What it signifies is that umbrella, formed by the earth’s magnetic field is gradually pointing in a different direction. Look up magnetic pole in relation to earth’s geological axis. Mankind has no effect on the magnetic pole shift.
The aurora borealis is a component of the magnetic pole. The magnetic lines of force in combination with the solar wind cause ionization of gas molecules present in our atmosphere. The effect is primarily connected to oxygen and nitrogen. If those areas of ionization are no longer located where they have been located historically; they could have profound effects on weather patterns.
Cliff Harris and Randy Mann of Harris-Mann Climatology believe that this shift in the magnetic pole location could be responsible for some of the recent violent weather conditions around the earth. These include massive blizzards in the northern hemisphere droughts in Africa and may even contribute to the recent tornado activity or record heat on our East Coast in the United States.

Yes climate changes!

Once you have seen the strings of the marionettes, you can NEVER watch the pantomime the same way again.
Ephesians 5:11

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • 300
  • 300's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Addicted to Freedom
  • Addicted to Freedom
More
3 weeks 3 days ago #145070 by 300
300 replied the topic: Truth About The Paris Climate Accord
In honor of Trump's decision, watch all of Sheila Gunn Reid's reports from the UN climate change convention

Much to see >> www.therebel.media/cop22_in_marrakech

Once you have seen the strings of the marionettes, you can NEVER watch the pantomime the same way again.
Ephesians 5:11

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: UserAbuser
Time to create page: 0.474 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum