Landmark Legal Case Could Stymie System

If everyone began using this defence tomorrow, in all of the Commonwealth courts and in the United States, the entire legal system could be brought to its knees in a matter of weeks if not days.”

For those of you who have been following the John Anthony Hill (JAH) Case, it is great to be able to share that he was acquitted, on the 12th of May 2011, of the ridiculous and politically-motivated charge of attempting to “pervert the course of justice”. For those of you less familiar with this landmark legal case, John Anthony Hill is the Producer of the documentary film “7/7 Ripple Effect”. For more details about this extraordinary case and the trial itself, please visit the following links:-

http://mtrial.org
http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com
http://terroronthetube.co.uk/2011/05/12/muaddib-acquitted/

There are two very important precedents that were established with this case that need to be studied in detail. There was a preliminary argument presented to the court to challenge both the jurisdiction and the sovereignty of Elizabeth Battenberg/Mountbatten, which was based on two distinct points. The first point being she was knowingly, and with malice aforethought, coronated on a fake stone in 1953 and thus has never been lawfully crowned.

There are those who may wish to argue that this point is irrelevant, as Judge Jeffrey Vincent Pegden did at the trial, wrongly thinking the Coronation is just a ceremony because she has been pretending to be the monarch for over 58 years. In actual fact the Coronation is a binding oath and a contract, requiring the monarch’s signature. Which brings us to the second point.

At that Coronation ceremony, Elizabeth signed a binding contract, before God and the British people, that she would do her utmost to maintain The Laws of God. This she solemnly swore to do, with her hand placed on the Sovereign’s Bible, before kissing The Bible and signing the contract. Please note well that in The Law of God, found in the first five books of The Bible, man-made legislation is strictly prohibited.

The very first time that she gave “royal assent” to any piece of man-made legislation, she broke her solemn oath with God and with the British people and she ceased to be the monarch with immediate effect. To date, she has broken her oath thousands and thousands of times, which is a water-proof, iron-clad, undeniable FACT. She is therefore without question not the monarch, but instead is a criminal guilty of high treason among her other numerous crimes.

All of the courts in the U.K. are referred to as HM courts or “her majesty’s” courts, which means every judge draws their authority from her. All cases brought by the state are “Regina vs. Xxxxxxx”, which means they are all brought in the name of the queen. So if she isn’t really the monarch, then she doesn’t have the authority or the jurisdiction to bring a case against anyone else. And neither do any of “her majesty’s” courts or judges.

Bearing in mind the legal maxim that no man can judge in his own cause, it should be crystal clear that no judge in the Commonwealth could lawfully rule on a challenge to the jurisdiction and sovereignty of the monarch. It is a question of their own authority, so they are obviously not impartial to the outcome. That is why the ONLY way the question of jurisdiction can lawfully and impartially be decided is by a jury. And that is exactly why John Anthony Hill requested a jury trial to decide his challenge to the jurisdiction and sovereignty of Elizabeth.

No judge under any circumstances can deny someone their right to request a jury trial. No judge can lawfully rule in their own cause. That doesn’t mean they won’t try, it only means that when they do, they are committing a criminal act (just as Judge Jeffrey Vincent Pegden did at John Anthony Hill’s trial) and that their decision is immediate grounds for an appeal and for a citizen’s arrest. The fact that the court and its corrupt judge tried to ignore this particular point is proof that they are well aware they have no lawful authority. That is one of the reasons why this is a landmark case. If everyone began using this defence tomorrow, in all of the Commonwealth courts and in the United States, the entire legal system could be brought to its knees in a matter of weeks if not days.

The signed by E2 coronation oath (Exhibit 1) and the Bible she swore on at that Coronation (Exhibit 2) clearly orders judges and lawyers to obey the Laws of God.

These two factual pieces of evidence ought to be presented at the start, as defence in every single victimless case, or those in progress, where you have been wrongfully charged, and to proceed forth Lawfully.

To make this perfectly clear, the way is available with the two pieces of evidence to shift the cases to begin to use only God’s Laws which demands a trial by jury, to proceed forth maintaining only God’s Laws with judges roles clearly defined.

 

Whilst E2 is committing treason, explained in full detail in the Lawful Argument, the signed oath orders obedience to all subjects to maintain only the Laws of God.

Judges/lawyers have taken an oath (B.A.R.), thus ordered to comply to Exhibit 1, and Exhibit 2 (Bible), and it is as simple as that. People lacked awareness of that which was in place, and there for people to use, but didn’t know. We know now.

For those of you in the United States who may be thinking “hey, we aren’t a Commonwealth country, why would this affect us?” all you really need to know is that these three little letters:- B.A.R., stand for the British Accreditation Registry. It doesn’t matter whether it is the Australian BAR or the Canadian BAR or the American BAR association; they ALL report to the British monarch, who is the head of the BAR.

So thanks to John Anthony Hill and this amazing precedent, we now all know a peaceful way to bring the system down. If enough people ACT and use this simple, bullet-proof defence, we can put an end to this insanity and injustice. All that is required now is for YOU to spread the word to as many as possible so that this peaceful rebellion can begin immediately. Or you can watch the last remnants of your freedoms swept away as the Global Elite plunge the entire world into bankruptcy and WW3 to usher in their “New World Order”.

For additional details about this bullet-proof defence, please visit: http://jahtruth.net/britmon.htm#crimes

By now some of you may be beginning to see the Light at the end of this very dark tunnel and are so enthusiastic about putting this simple plan into motion that you may have forgotten there was a second precedent set during this landmark case.

While the official reason for this trial was to address this trumped-up and frivolous charge of attempting to “pervert the course of justice”, the real reason for this trial was so the authorities could punish John Anthony Hill for making the “7/7 Ripple Effect” which, in less than an hour and using strictly mainstream media reports, completely dismantles the official government conspiracy theory. The film is so credible that even the prosecution at the trial, after showing it in its entirety to the jurors, admitted that the film was made in such a way that it “changes the minds of people who see it.” That’s how powerful the truth really is.

This was the first time this information was shown at an official proceeding and the results were impressive. At least 83% of the jurors felt the film accurately depicted what happened in London on July 7th, 2005 and that John Anthony Hill did the right thing. For those unfamiliar with the case, JAH forwarded copies of the “7/7 Ripple Effect” to the Kingston Crown court in 2008 in the hope of correcting misleading statements made by the judge and the QC at the outset of the first trial of the supposed “7/7 helpers” (who were also found not guilty).

John Anthony Hill was also able to enter into the official record his testimony about what happened on September 11th, 2001 in the United States and that both 9/11 and 7/7 were false flag attacks. He went on to show the jurors the now infamous BBC report of the collapse of the Salomon Brothers building (WTC7) by Jane Standley on 9/11/2001. She reported the collapse 25 minutes before it actually occurred, and with the building clearly visible and still standing in the window behind Jane Standley’s left shoulder, leaving no doubt that the BBC had foreknowledge of the event.

As a result of the “7/7 Ripple Effect” being shown to the jurors by the prosecution and John Anthony Hill’s testimony about 9/11, the truth that those two events were false flag attacks and that the mainstream media is nothing more than a government propaganda machine is now officially on record.

And the “Not Guilty” verdict by the jury is a ringing endorsement of that official record.

This case brings with it a New Hope and the opportunity for a new beginning, where liberty, justice, and peace aren’t just nice sounding words, but a reality. This could be heaven on earth instead of the hell we have let it become by allowing all of this evil to grow up around us. Just as John Anthony Hill has shown us by example, all it takes is a dauntless faith that good will always triumph over evil and the courage to take action to do the right thing, regardless of the personal cost.

All that is required for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.” – Edmund Burke

by Debra Siddons

33 Comments

  1. No judge under any circumstances can deny someone their right to request a jury trial. No judge can lawfully rule in their own cause. That doesn’t mean they won’t try, it only means that when they do, they are committing a criminal act (just as Judge Jeffrey Vincent Pegden did at John Anthony Hill’s trial) and that their decision is immediate grounds for an appeal and for a citizen’s arrest.

    • They can if they are not a judge in a lawful court, and you just think they are.

  2. "The film is so credible that even the prosecution at the trial, after showing it in its entirety to the jurors, admitted that the film was made in such a way that it “changes the minds of people who see it.” That’s how powerful the truth really is."

  3. I'm just wondering how is the coronation stone a fake stone?

    • David Lister (June 15, 2008). "Stone of Destiny a 'fake to dupe invading English', Abbot of Scone hid real stone from Edward I, says Salmond". The Times. "The stone, said to have been used in the coronation of early Scottish monarchs and in Biblical times by Jacob as a pillow, is one of the earliest symbols of Scottish nationhood and has been an emblem of strained relations with England ever since it was stolen by Edward I in 1296. … He said that monks at Scone Abbey had probably duped the English into believing that they had stolen the stone when, in fact, they took a replica."

  4. The Monarchy, Westminster style of Government & the Empire is sooo last millennia.
    I think the remedy is to make sure the future is not an extension of the past.

  5. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z5fIwLo1Trs – UCC 1-202 PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE , WHICH can be USED in ANY COURT ON THE PLANET in ALL COMMERCIAL, CIVIL & CRIMINAL CASES being done in the name of: Regina / Her Majesty / The QUEEN / HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF… etc…. FYI for those whose Eye is Open.

  6. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z5fIwLo1Trs – UCC 1-202 PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE , WHICH can be USED in ANY COURT ON THE PLANET in ALL COMMERCIAL, CIVIL & CRIMINAL CASES being done in the name of: Regina / Her Majesty / The QUEEN / HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF… etc…. FYI for those whose Eye is Open.

  7. I hope someone does bring it down, she broke her oath end of it, so she don't deserve to our queen, as she is not the right thing by her people….

  8. coronated is neither a word nor a past participle, so the argumnet is a non sequitur: the word is crowned.

  9. But us AMERIKANS we're to stewpid……

  10. thank u so much for bring this forword so what's going to happen now that the people know now and we alould these people to over power us hummmm.

  11. what do you think the chances are that GovCo will just say " SO WHAT?" and keep on doing what they are doing?

  12. brilliant piece been following Mo's (John Hill) work since 7/7 and seen this man harassed sentenced kidnapped by the authorities and treated like shit of the main stream (BBC Conspiracy Files) and others. I am really proud of you Mo for your commitment and dedication to the truth. No Fear!

  13. You guys do realise that the Queen was told not to sign the document that makes her Queen, so she did not sign the any document during her coronation and to this day has not been or ever will be the sworn Queen of England.

  14. The true Monarch resides right here in NSW….There is a docu on Utbe..done by the frontman of the tv series TIMETEAM…I believe that's the name of the show. It's a lenghty piece full of the History of how the illegitemacy came about. It truly is extrodinary and NO..it is NOT a theory…its cold hard fact.

  15. High ranking members of the Australian Government including Kevin Rudd, Julia Gillard and Tony Abbott are facing charges of treason in the Australian Federal Court.

    The prosecution was brought against Rudd and Abbott as well as the Australian Electoral Commission by Brian Shaw after the Oath of Allegiance and reference to the British Crown were removed from Australian laws.

    "Mr Kevin Rudd did have actual knowledge of the fact that the Crown and Monarch had been removed without any referendum whatsoever and that Julia Gillard and others had been charged [with treason]."

    "The defendant (John Howard) within the Commonwealth of Australia during the period 1st January 2004 up to and inclusive of the present date did commit the offence of Common Law Treason…"

    Mr Shaw alleges senior Australian Politicians and Judges committed or concealed treason, particularly related to the removal of reference to the Monarch in Western Australia.

    He also alleges that all birth certificates in Australia are turned into Bonds which are traded on the global stock market, a form of Human Trafficing according to the affidavit.

    http://199.85.215.243/Affidavit_Brian_Shaw_vs_AEC.pdf

    - See more at: http://dnews.co.nz/node/26#sthash.FIHMDX5c.dpuf

  16. proper spitting image of my nan xx

  17. In 1993 a piece of legislation was passed through England's House of Lords in Westminster declared lawful and just under common law having circulated through out the whole of the British Common Wealth before obtaining Royal Assent which requires the Queens Seal [made under Royal Decree] making it a crown law a treasonable offence to violate, also enforcing her Majesty's fiduciary title equivalent of the Queen holding the powers of CEO or Custodian to the Company called Aotearoa New Zealand the owners and beneficiaries are the customary owners of the land known as the People Maori. This was commissioned by the Queen in her role under Part III of the Treaty of Waitangi 1840. In the late 80s to mid 90s after civil unrest ignited by boycott of Springbok Tours where all of New Zealand were united against apartheid, comparison were drawn by the New Zealand General Public with how People Maori had undergone over the past 150 years of grievances under colonial rule evident still today. Considered to be an act of discrimination by the acting legal system past and present. Racial profiling due to race, color, creed. Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth commissioned a Regent Joseph Murphy aka Hohepa Mapiria to assists her with the repatriation of stolen land and the rights of the indigenous people to be restored. The Legislation was called Te Ture Whenua Maori Land Act 1993/ The Maori Land Act 1993 created by the People Maori for the People Maori it was not created by the New Zealand Parliament in Wellington a precedent Un-Extinguished Native Title under THE NATIVE DISTRICTS REGULATION ACT, 1858.-No.4 [Still un-repealed to this day] WHEREAS it is expedient, in order to promote the civilisation of the Native race, that the Governor in council be enabled to make and put in force, within districts over which the Native title has not been extinguished etc….
    1. It shall be lawful for the Governor in Council from time to time to appoint districts for the purposes of this Act, being districts over which the Native title shall not for the time being have been extinguished, and any such appointment to vary or revoke.

    This protects against the illegal State Assets Sales. The Queen understands that the pseudo Govt are not the true custodians of New Zealand nor has she ever granted them authority to do so acknowledgement is given to her forefathers whom implemented the Declaration of Independence 1835 and a gifted New Zealand/Nu Terini the first Official Flag where also those elected Chiefs granted authority to govern over themselves . In 1947 The New Zealand Parliament was born formerly named the New South Wales Settlers Parliament a penal Colony of Australia. In recognition of People Maori service in two world wars the New Zealand Govt were granted authority to make laws governing themselves only and People Maori are to remain self governing records are available to public via the National Archives in Wellington…

  18. HM is not the queen, it is the Crown Corporation/City of london masquerading as the queen.

  19. Not any more
    He recently died

  20. Fuck the the Queen and all the moronarchists!

  21. What was the original lost case, in which the freeman tchniques were used, that also resulted in this narrow escape from a charge of perverting the cause of justice? This is the lack of success for which these bullshit techniques are famous. This may be a laudable attempt to bring down the system with the power of bullshit, but it is legal suicide to try any of this in court.

  22. The Crown is owned by the Knights Templars and the monarchy lease it from them.. has been that way since about 1236

  23. At the end of the day.. Would you rather have HRH QE II or the pope with cannon law which says you are guilty before the law until you can prove you are innocent.. Crown Law or Cannon Law….. That is the choice… Keep the Magna Cata or scrap it?

Submit a Comment