Patrick is friends with WaveWalker

WaveWalker created a new topic ' NEVER Let a Good Crisis Go to Waste! - THE BANK of CANADA' in the forum. 2 years ago

.

THE CRISIS

FOR THE 1%

IS


COMER V. THE BANK OF CANADA



Everyone over fourteen should know about this.

The bonus is that the media is NOT covering it .... for when the people find out it's going to open a HUGE Can ‘o’ Worms

People can't blow this off as a Conspiracy Theory ... It Don't get more REAL!

All that has to be done is to inform the people; I have prepared the following charts as in general people don't like dealing with numbers.

At the bottom is a pdf file that can be e-mailed to anyone or made into BIG posters

BANK of CANADA SHOULD BE THE #1 ISSUE IN THE ELECTION!!!


Bill Abram originally tweaked by curiosity to extend his graph to 1987.
Considering the BoC lawsuit I figured I'd better get on it.

Any ideas for informing 20 million people or more are welcome.

(I have made these charts with the view in mind that they will stand up to court scrutiny.)


1.%20DEBT%20Chart_1974_zpsaumlvele.jpg

2.%20DEBT%20Chart_2005_zpsjtceboqj.jpg

3.%20DEBT%20Pie%20Chart%201867-1992_zpsocxbqeay.jpg

4.%20DEBT%20Chart_2013_zpsio2dgywe.jpg

5.%20DEBT%20Chart_2025_zpsnq8zake2.jpg

6.%20DEBT%20Chart_ALL%20IN_zpse1xcd7bx.jpg

7.%20DEBT%20What%20Does%20it%20Mean%20to%20ME_zpscjs6qdhd.jpg


Attachment

Read More...

WaveWalker created a new topic ' test' in the forum. 2 years ago

THE CRISIS

FOR THE 1%

IS


COMER V. THE BANK OF CANADA



Everyone over fourteen should know about this.

The bonus is that the media is NOT covering it .... for when the people find out it's going to open a HUGE Can ‘o’ Worms

People can't blow this off as a Conspiracy Theory ... It Don't get more REAL!

All that has to be done is to inform the people; I have prepared the following charts as in general people don't like dealing with numbers.

At the bottom is a pdf file that can be e-mailed to anyone or made into BIG posters

BANK of CANADA SHOULD BE THE #1 ISSUE IN THE ELECTION!!!


Any ideas for informing 20 million people or more are welcome.


1.%20DEBT%20Chart_1974_zpsaumlvele.jpg

2.%20DEBT%20Chart_2005_zpsjtceboqj.jpg

3.%20DEBT%20Pie%20Chart%201867-1992_zpsocxbqeay.jpg

4.%20DEBT%20Chart_2013_zpsio2dgywe.jpg

5.%20DEBT%20Chart_2025_zpsnq8zake2.jpg

6.%20DEBT%20Chart_ALL%20IN_zpse1xcd7bx.jpg

7.%20DEBT%20What%20Does%20it%20Mean%20to%20ME_zpscjs6qdhd.jpg


Attachment

Read More...

WaveWalker created a new topic ' Britain and Canada Involved in Foiled US Venezuelan Coup' in the forum. 2 years ago

www.globalresearch.ca/britain-and-canada...an-coup-plot/5431523


Britain and Canada were co-conspirators in the latest plot to topple Venezuela’s government.

TeleSUR provided detailed coverage of Washington’s war on Venezuelan democracy. Its dirty hands manipulate violence and instability worldwide.

US funded and supported key opposition fascist figures Antonio Ledezma, Maria Corina Machado and Leopoldo Lopez released a joint February 11 communique a day before the foiled coup.

Titled “A Call on Venezuelans for a National Accord for the Transition,” it promoted regime change. Called for Venezuela to be handed back to monied interests.

Called Bolivarian fairness “anti-democra(tic)…inefficient and… corrupt.” Run by “an unscrupulous elite (making) the State totalitarian.” Creating “a humanitarian crisis.”

“(T)he Maduro government has entered a terminal phase.” Claimed it’s “the duty of every democrat to help resolve the current crisis, to defend freedom…to make the transition…(to restore) democratic order.”

Ledezma, Marhado and Lopez want Maduro’s government violently overthrown, democracy crushed.

Washington, Britain and Canada hatched the latest plot to return Venezuela to its bad old days. TeleSUR reported new details.

“Fresh evidence” showing their involvement, saying:

“Many of the individuals being charged, included a military general – whom has confessed to participating in the plans – and a retired lieutenant colonel – have indicated you (fascist Justice Party president Julio Borges) as being a key participant in meetings, which resulted in the decision to carry out a series of bombing attacks as a part of the coup, targeting the Presidential Palace, the National Assembly,” key ministries, TeleSUR’s offices, and other Caracas sites.

Venezuelan authorities identified US embassy personnel involved. So were a Royal Canadian Mounted Police official and UK diplomatic core member, according to National Assembly President Diosdado Cabello.

They sought information on airport capabilities in case needed in an emergency.

Computers seized had detailed coup plans, including maps showing targets to be bombed.

A video showed military officials announcing Maduro’s government no longer was recognized. It was scheduled to be aired after planned bombings were launched. Either by a Venezuelan or Miami TV station.

Cabello showed a 10-year visa given to one of the plotters days ahead of the planned coup.

He noted Obama’s recent statement about “American leadership at times entail(ing) twisting the arms of states which don’t do what we need them to do.”

He said coup plotters planned to topple Venezuela’s government forcefully on the anniversary of US-manipulated 2014 street violence.

Killing 43. Injuring hundreds. Causing billions of dollars in physical and economic damage.

US planned, funded, implemented and directed economic, political, and street warfare continues to topple the hemisphere’s most vibrant democracy.

On Saturday, Maduro addressed Venezuelans a second time on national television. Following up on his Thursday coup plot revelations.

Explaining more details of Washington’s scheme to oust him forcefully. “Almost all (opposition) leaders knew about this plan, this ambush, almost all of them, including the four-time losing candidate,” Maduro explained.

Referring to Henrique Capriles Radonski. One of many Venezuelan fascists wanting power back the old-fashioned way.

“I’m not saying all of them were actively involved,” Maduro said. “But it was a rumor circulating amongst them, that something was about to happen.

Figures arrested confessed to the plot, Maduro explained. They provided more evidence of Washington’s scheme.

It involved enlisting Venezuelan political and military officials. Bribing them with large cash payments. America’s Caracas embassy was coup plot headquarters.

Maduro called on Obama to stop interfering in Venezuelan affairs, saying:

“In your name, they are organizing coup plots against (Venezuela’s) democratically elected government…”

Bolivian President Evo Morales expressed solidarity with Maduro saying “(w)e all have the obligation to enforce respect for democracy and elections, and if we have a clear conscious, not even the empire can defeat us.”

Maduro received numerous other messages of support. Nicaraguan President Daniel Ortega condemned the “criminal and futile attempts of the empire to undermine the Bolivarian Revolution.”

From Mexico City, the Network of Intellectuals, Artists and Social Movements in Defense of Humanity expressed solidarity in an official statement. It condemned plans to topple Venezuela’s government.

TeleSUR reported civil and political organizations worldwide expressing solidarity with Venezuela.

Union of South American Nations (UNASUR) Secretary General Ernesto Samper denounced plans to oust Maduro.

Venezuelan opposition spokesman Jesus Torrealba lied saying “(t)he government makes up these stories about coups to avoid talking about how the country is breaking down.”

State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki lied calling accusations about Washington plotting Maduro’s ouster “ridiculous.”

She absurdly added:

“(T)he United States does not support political transitions by non-constitutional means.”

“Political transitions must be democratic, constitutional, peaceful, and legal.”

“We have seen many times that the Venezuelan Government tries to distract from its own actions by blaming the United States or other members of the international community for events inside Venezuela. These efforts reflect a lack of seriousness on the part of the Venezuelan Government to deal with the grave situation it faces.”

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.. His new book as editor and contributor is titled “Flashpoint in Ukraine: US Drive for Hegemony Risks WW III.” www.claritypress.com/LendmanIII.html Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com. Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network. It airs three times weekly: live on Sundays at 1PM Central time plus two prerecorded archived programs.

Read More...

WaveWalker created a new topic ' Tech Problems' in the forum. 2 years ago

Hi
I am having problems linking images.
These one are png's

ALSO having problems with a private message.
No Name comes up when I do a search .... hence this thread for HELP!

Is there an issue(s), I have done them both before.

Thanks
ww
Read More...

WaveWalker created a new topic ' You never want a serious crisis to go to waste - BoC DEBT' in the forum. 2 years ago

THE CRISIS
FOR THE 1%
IS
COMER V. THE BANK OF CANADA


Everyone over fourteen should know about this.

The bonus is that the media is NOT covering it .... for when the people find out it's going to open a HUGE Can o Worms

People can't blow this off as a Conspiracy Theory ... It Don't get more real!

All that has to be done is to inform the people; I have prepared the following charts as in general ppl don't like dealing with numbers.

At the bottom is a pdf file that can be e-mailed to anyone.

THIS SHOULD BE THE #1 ISSUE IN THE ELECTION!!!


d3d13384-45c4-48c5-9c86-8ef7b0411bad_zpszwf3oace.png.html?sort=3&o=0
Read More...

WaveWalker replied to the topic 'Introduction' in the forum. 2 years ago

trvthseeker wrote:

Good little slaves will register their cars and their children to their masters

That seems like a bit of a cop out trvthseeker without responding to the many issues involved.

Look at the time Dean Clifford wasted with it: 3 trucks confiscated, multiple arrests, not to mention a brilliant mind locked up.

Dean himself cautioned against pursuing this avenue and stated if you in accident your in big trouble.

IMO I think it is totally irresponsible BUT am open to discussion.

Have you de-registered trvthseeker?
Read More...

bmxninja357 thanks user 'WaveWalker' in the forum message ' Introduction'. 2 years ago
WaveWalker replied to the topic 'Introduction' in the forum. 2 years ago

Personally I just don't get the point of de-registering a car.
If you de-register a car you can't get insurance. SO what happens if your in an accident.
You ARE in BIG trouble that's what.

I think it is totally irresponsible and a waste of time to pursue.

SO what is the point???

I posted something similar a couple of years back but got no response.

BUT I am open to a discussion of the issue.

ww
Read More...

WaveWalker replied to the topic 'The Bank of Canada lawsuit court case' in the forum. 2 years ago

Xabre wrote:

they are both corrupt to the core
I wonder how many news bans have been placed with the public none the wiser.

DECADES of spins, Fukushima was the first ban that really caught my eye BUT I'm sure there have been many more. :sick:


The Case to Reinstate the Bank of Canada
By Global Research News
Global Research, February 07, 2015
The Clifford Hugh Douglas Institute

by M. Oliver Heydorn
There is a very interesting legal case that is playing out in Canada at the moment. William Krehm, Anne Emmett, and COMER (The Committee for Monetary and Economic Reform: www.comer.org/) filed a lawsuit on December 12th, 2011, in Federal Court to try to force a restoration of the Bank of Canada to its mandated purposes. In essence, they want the Bank of Canada to provide interest-free loans to the federal, provincial, and municipal governments, as provided for in the Bank of Canada Act.


This money would be used to finance public expenditures whenever there is a budgetary deficit. Apparently, the federal government used to borrow interest-free (to at least some extent) from the Bank of Canada up until 1974. At present, governments borrow all of the necessary money (apart from any bonds they may sell to the public) from private banks at the going rate of interest. Canadians are economically burdened with the resultant debt-servicing charges because the Bank of Canada does not make use of its prerogatives in the interests of the Canadian public. The case is being prosecuted by Rocco Galati, who is widely considered to be Canada’s top constitutional lawyer.

The nature of the lawsuit has been explained on www.pressfortruth.ca in the following terms:

“TWO CANADIANS AND A CANADIAN ECONOMIC THINK TANK CONFRONT THE GLOBAL FINANCIAL POWERS IN THE CANADIAN FEDERAL COURT. THE CANADIANS PLEAD FOR DECLARATIONS THAT WOULD RESTORE THE USE OF THE BANK OF CANADA FOR THE BENEFIT OF CANADIANS AND REMOVE IT FROM THE CONTROL OF INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE ENTITIES WHOSE INTERESTS AND DIRECTIVES ARE PLACED ABOVE THE INTEREST OF CANADIANS AND THE PRIMACY OF THE CONSTITUTION OF CANADA

Canadian constitutional lawyer, Rocco Galati, on behalf of Canadians William Krehm, and Ann Emmett, and COMER (Committee for Monetary and Economic Reform) on December 12th, 2011 filed an action in Federal Court, to restore the use of the Bank of Canada to its original purpose, by exercising its public statutory duty and responsibility. That purpose includes making interest free loans to municipal/provincial/federal governments for “human capital” expenditures (education, health, other social services) and /or infrastructure expenditures.The action also constitutionally challenges the government’s fallacious accounting methods in its tabling of the budget by not calculating nor revealing the true and total revenues of the nation before transferring back “tax credits” to corporations and other taxpayers. The Plaintiffs state that since 1974 there has been a gradual but sure slide into the reality that the Bank of Canada and Canada’s monetary and financial policy are dictated by private foreign banks and financial interests contrary to the Bank of Canada Act.

The Plaintiffs state that the Bank of International Settlements (BIS), the Financial Stability Forum (FSF) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) were all created with the cognizant intent of keeping poorer nations in their place which has now expanded to all nations in that these financial institutions largely succeed in over-riding governments and constitutional orders in countries such as Canada over which they exert financial control.

The Plaintiffs state that the meetings of the BIS and Financial Stability Board (FSB) (successor of FSF), their minutes, their discussions and deliberations are secret and not available nor accountable to Parliament, the executive, nor the Canadian public notwithstanding that the Bank of Canada policies directly emanate from these meetings. These organizations are essentially private, foreign entities controlling Canada’s banking system and socio-economic policies.
The Plaintiffs state that the defendants (officials) are unwittingly and /or wittingly, in varying degrees, knowledge and intent engaged in a conspiracy, along with the BIS, FSB, IMF to render impotent the Bank of Canada Act as well as Canadian sovereignty over financial, monetary, and socio-economic policy, and bypass the sovereign rule of Canada through its Parliament by means of banking and financial systems.” pressfortruth.ca/top-stories/case-reinstate-bank-canada/


On the 26th of January, 2015, the latest appeal on behalf of the Crown to have the case dismissed was rejected by three judges in Federal Court in Toronto. The Federal government now has 60 days to appeal the decision to the Supreme Court. Cf. pressfortruth.ca/top-stories/update-bank-canada-vs-comer/. Interestingly enough, both the case itself and the various developments that have occured are not being covered at all by the mainstream media. While Mr. Galati’s other cases have regularly received wall-to-wall coverage across the country, this particular case, which he believes is probably his most important case to date, has so far been ignored. When questioned about this, Mr. Galati said that he has a firm basis for believing that the Canadian government has requested or ordered that the mainstream media not cover the case (he could not divulge his sources), and that, in his opinion, the government does control the media to a certain extent and on certain limited issues. He also added that he does not believe that we in Canada are living in a democracy. In fact, as far back as 1999, he has been on record as claiming that we have entered a ‘quiet dictatorship.’


As far as its merits are concerned, Mr. Galati said that the case is on solid legal and constitutional grounds and his clients should win. Whether they will win or not is another question. As Mr. Galati has acknowledged: “Not all meritorious cases in our judicial system win”.

From a Social Credit perspective, saving the taxpayer large sums of money and/or preserving the country from an increase in public indebtedness via the issuance of interest-free money from the Bank of Canada is certainly a good thing.[1] However, such a reform of the system does not address the fundamental problem with the present financial and economic orders: the chronic lack of consumer buying power. The macroeconomic gap between prices and incomes, which is primarily caused by how real capital (machines and equipment) are financed and how their costs are then accounted for under existing conventions, is THE issue which needs to be addressed. In the main, the present system deals with the gap by filling it with additional debt-money from the private banking system in the form of public, corporate, and consumer debts. In lieu of these palliatives, a Social Credit system would fill the gap with ‘debt-free’ money and distribute it to consumers, directly through a National Dividend, and indirectly through a National Discount on retail prices. It is critical that the individual, the common consumer, be the prime beneficiary of any monetary reform and that he be accorded full control of credit-policy within the context of a properly functioning financial system.


In connection with this particular lawsuit and as a further clarification of the point just made, I should also mention that granting the government the right to fill the gap according to its policy-objectives (i.e., employing people to work on public production), or, more broadly, granting it or the state the sole right to control the whole money supply, is thoroughly incompatible with Social Credit’s underlying social and political philosophy. Institutions exist to serve the interests of individuals, not the other way around. That is, individual consumers must control financial policy, not the government, the state, or the private banks. There is no point in “restoring the right to create and issue money to the state” if the state is then going to control the purposes for which producer and consumer credit are to be issued. This is the great trap of which certain monetary reformers, who are rightly concerned about the hegemony of private banking, are blissfully unaware. If, God forbid, such reformers get their way, and the state were to obtain total monopoly control over the money supply, I think they will find to their horror that the same people who levy a great deal of control over the private and partially decentralized monetary system will be in complete control of the state system.

Monopoly is the name of the game; let us not be ‘useful idiots’.

Addendum:
Those individuals who believe that the main problem with the current financial system and economic regime consists in the mere fact that the private banks create the bulk of the money supply ex nihilo and then charge interest on the loans that they issue would do well to carefully read the following blog posts which explain the differences between this view and the unique Social Credit approach to monetary reform: (emphasis added)

www.socred.org/blogs/view/social-credit-and-usury, www.socred.org/blogs/view/usury-social-credit-and-catholicism

www.socred.org/blogs/view/social-credit-...omic-copernican-turn

Douglas often criticized the practice of relying on borrowings from private banks at the going market rate of interest in order to finance government operations. Cf., for example, C.H. Douglas, Social Credit, rev.ed. (Gordon Press, New York: 1973), 136-139:

“The National Debt rose between August 1914 and December 1919 from about six hundred and sixty millions sterling, to about seven thousand seven hundred millions sterling. And this rise represents, on the whole, the expenditure over that period which it was deemed impracticable to recover in current taxation. That is to say, if we take the average taxation for supply purposes over that period 1914-1918, as being about three hundred millions per annum, the amount paid by the public as consumer for the goods and services supplied to it for war purposes, was about thirteen hundred and fifty millions, and the financial cost of those goods and services was about eight thousand three hundred and fifty millions, a ratio of cost to price of about roughly 1 : 6.2. In other words, goods were sold to the public at one-sixth of their apparent financial cost, and no one lost any money over it at the time. How was this done?


A considerable amount of this money (some of which may be in excess of the figures just mentioned) was created through what are known as the Ways and Means Accounts, and the working of this is described in the first report of the Committee on Currency and Foreign Exchanges, 1918, page two. Paraphrased, the process may be shortly explained as follows.


If ten million pounds credit is advanced at the Bank of England to the credit of Public (i.e. State) Deposits (which simply involves the writing up of the Public Deposits account by this amount), this amount is paid out by the Spending Departments to contractors in payment for their services, and when the cheques are cleared, passes to the credit of the contractors’ bankers (joint Stock Banks) account with the Bank of England. The joint Stock Banks are accustomed to regard their credits with the Bank of England as cash at call and, therefore, ten million pounds is credited to the depositors of the Joint Stock Banks, and ten million pounds to the Joint Stock Banks’ cash account.


As a result of this, the joint Stock Banks, working on a ratio of one to four between so-called cash and short-date liabilities, are able to allow their customers (working on Government contracts) overdrafts to the extent of forty millions, a portion of which their customers may devote to taking up Treasury Bills or War Loans. The banks themselves may take up about eight millions of Treasury Bills or War Loan, out of their additional ‘deposit’ balances, or they may lend about eight millions to the Bank of England to lend to the Government. Eventually, the result is the same, namely that the Government owes forty millions to the banks, through the Bank of England.


Now the first point to notice is that the result of this complicated process is exactly the same as if the Government itself had provided forty millions, in Currency Notes, with the important exception that the public pays 4 or 5 per cent per annum on the forty millions, instead of merely paying the cost of printing the Currency Notes.

The effect on prices, while the forty millions is outstanding, is the same, and the contractors pay 6 or 7 per cent for their overdrafts instead of getting the use of the money, free. But if the forty millions is redeemed through taxation, or a Capital Levy, the public pays not only the 5 per cent per annum, together with the contractor’s 6 or 7 per cent, plus a profit on both of them, but it pays the whole of the forty millions out of money which has been received in respect of wages, salaries, and dividends. So far as I am aware, no one has ever suggested that Currency Notes should be retired by taxation. It is true that when this forty millions has been repaid, both the original debt and the repayment cancel each other, and only the interest charges go to the Profit and Loss Account of the Bank. But since, as we have seen, the repayment of bank loans means the immobilisation of an equivalent amount of price-values, this only means that a fresh loan with fresh interest charges has to be created. A consideration of these facts will make it easy to understand the implacable opposition of bankers and financiers to Government paper money and their insistence on the importance of what they term redemption. The payment in current taxation of only one-sixth of the price of war stores, etc., meant, therefore, that a credit grant of the other five-sixths of the price was made to the Public. The repayment of this credit is only justifiable on the assumption that banks own Public Credit.”
Read More...

Thanks terr-y

I love enlightening news.
I thought Dean was cooked on those charges.

Right On Dean ... Smoke Em! :P
Read More...

WaveWalker replied to the topic 'I paid my mortgage with a promissory note' in the forum. 2 years ago

kiwi wrote:

Yeah, and they're allowed to do that, they're not doing anything unlawful when they do it. So what are you going to do about that? Are you just going to sit around here moaning about it and posting angry emoticons, or do you have an actual plan?

If your past performance is anything to go by, WaveWalker, I'd say you're just going to sit around moaning about it.

Allowed by whom; our fraudulently elected government or by politicians who were coerced by criminals to do their bidding or your career is dead OR you may have an accident OR just let us bribe you.

Judging me by my past performance (of which you know squat) doesn't define who I am; it defines who you are kiwi. :blink:
Read More...

WaveWalker replied to the topic 'I paid my mortgage with a promissory note' in the forum. 2 years ago

bmxninja357 wrote:

it doesn't really matter how the lender got what he lent you.

The reality is the lender don't got the money he lent you; he just made it up based on your signature
Read More...

WaveWalker replied to the topic 'IM DONE!!!' in the forum. 2 years ago

I'll miss you Xabre, you have contributed a lot.

I get pissed at the ShitHeads too.

We're here for learning & helping others NOT for a PissFest

ww
Read More...

WaveWalker replied to the topic 'Magna Carta' in the forum. 2 years ago

Farewell Magna Carta: the Counter-Terrorism and Security Bill

A new law being rushed through Westminster with little scrutiny is a direct attack on our freedom.

The Counter-terrorism and Security Bill currently going through Parliament, with virtually no opposition, impinges on basic freedoms and seems calculated to entrench the treatment of British Muslims as non-citizens.

The Bill is being rushed through parliament with no pre-legislative scrutiny or public consultation on most of its provisions – a speed justified by the increased terror threat posed by the return of young Muslims from Syria and Iraq.[1] Introduced at the end of November, it finished its Commons stages on 7 January and had its second Lords reading on 13 January. It is scheduled to finish its Lords stages on 4 February and to become law shortly afterwards. Consultation documents on draft statutory guidance and codes of practice were published just before parliament went on its Christmas break, and consultations close on 30 January.

In essence what the Bill proposes is to apply immigration policing measures – including border controls, carrier sanctions, refusal of entry, conditions of residence, the outsourcing of controls to local authorities, colleges and universities and other public bodies – to the national security policing of both British and foreign citizens, while at the same time doing away with or diluting judicial safeguards. But this national security policing is policing of thoughts, intentions, opinions and attitudes, in a climate in which the Muslim community is by definition suspect. Inevitably, the brunt of this policing will be borne by the Muslim community. Because immigration controls are the vehicle, more British Muslims will find the rights of citizenship increasingly precarious and contingent.

Travel bans

Under the Bill, a police or immigration officer will be able to seize someone’s passport at the port to prevent them leaving the country (whether they are British or foreign), on a reasonable suspicion that the person ‘intends to leave the UK in connection with terrorism-related activity’ abroad. No reasons need be given. Refusal to hand over the passport will be a criminal offence. Force can be used to seize the passport, which can be retained for two weeks, or thirty days with permission from a magistrate, who can’t refuse if the officer is investigating with diligence and expedition. The hearing before the magistrate will be subject to the ‘closed material procedure’ which will exclude the person concerned and his or her lawyer. There is no provision for compensation if the seizure turns out to be wrongful and the suspicion groundless, and the power can be used repeatedly, with minimal safeguards.

There is already power under the royal prerogative to cancel or withdraw British passports (a power used twenty-nine times in the 18 months from April 2013)[2]. The power was used against Moazzam Begg who has campaigned against UK complicity in torture and rendition since his release from Guantanamo, when he returned from Syria in December 2013. (Begg was later arrested on terrorism charges and held in maximum-security prison until his trial, which collapsed in October 2014.) As well as the prerogative power, a ban on international travel can be imposed on anyone believed to be engaged in terrorism-related activity as part of a Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Order (TPIM). But the TPIM contains much more stringent safeguards, including the need for police or security services to obtain judicial authorisation before imposing the order. JUSTICE observed that the government’s justification for the extra powers was as scant as its protection against arbitrariness in their implementation.

The observation has particular cogency in relation to Muslims, who bear the brunt of what Muslim organisations see as the systematic misuse of anti-terrorist examinations under Schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act 2000 at ports, both on arrival and on departure. For some, such examinations have become a routine harassment. Questions about prayer (seen as an indicator of terrorist propensities), and requests to spy on their communities, sometimes combined with threats, are common, they say. Muslim organisations CAGE, the Muslim Council of Britain and the Islamic Human Rights Commission have campaigned against the discriminatory and disproportionate use of Schedule 7 on Muslim passengers, which has become an occasion for ethnic and religious profiling, with people identifying as Pakistani 154 times more likely to be stopped than those identifying as white. Unlike the Schedule 7 powers, the new power to seize a passport needs reasonable suspicion. But with no need to give reasons, no judicial scrutiny unless documents are retained for two weeks, and even then, no scrutiny of the reasons for seizure, the scope for systematic misuse, for suspicion based solely or largely on racial and religious profiling, is as great as under Schedule 7.

Source and full piece: Frances Webber, Open Democracy, 19 January 2015

Read more at: wakeupfromyourslumber.com/farewell-magna...m-and-security-bill/
Read More...

WaveWalker replied to the topic 'JOIN US IN OUR FIGHT TO TAKE CANADA BACK!' in the forum. 2 years ago

VNTT wrote:

Yes I know people are waking up but do you realize we are dealing with the people that control the media, banks, hollywood, GMO foods, government, medical mafia, on and on and on. They have created wars for thousands of years.

I agree VNTT BUT people have been practically dead asleep for thousands of years too.
AND "The bigger they are the harder they fall" (A proven concept)

Look how fast the Berlin wall came down .... practically overnight

Look at the impossibilities Michael Harris has accomplished.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=9TkBWGtz1YU

HELL; it wouldn't be any FUN unless you have to fight for it! B)
Read More...

WaveWalker replied to the topic 'JOIN US IN OUR FIGHT TO TAKE CANADA BACK!' in the forum. 2 years ago

Thanks VNTT

To be more precise I would like to know "WHO" is behind Operation Maple.

I was quite taken aback when a friend was trying to get me to join avaaz.org
I thought it was a great idea.

When I went to the site the first thing that tweaked me was the picture of the polar bear
That picture was de-bunked about 6-7 years ago as a fraud for polar bear extinction
I let that pass
Then I read up on the Global Warming article and knew the info was way out of date.
I let that pass
Then went to search for projects I may be interested in ... NO search engine HMmmm.
Then I noticed there was NO Blog or comment area HMmmm again
They did have e-mail so I did e-mail them to see if these items were left out or coming or?
No response

Then I searched on the internet and discovered that George Soros set it up and it is controlled by his team.
For whatever purposes he can make money off of.

SO I check a little deeper now to see who I am dealing with.

Operation Maple is hard to search out as the name has been around for eons.

Possibly they just want to keep a low profile ... I get that ... me too!

I think it could be a good site to get the Comer lawsuit out there a little more.
Read More...

WaveWalker replied to the topic 'I paid my mortgage with a promissory note' in the forum. 2 years ago

Xabre wrote:

As per your advice

Sorry about that "don't get your drift" ... a wee bit brain dead and twisted this morning
Read More...

WaveWalker replied to the topic 'JOIN US IN OUR FIGHT TO TAKE CANADA BACK!' in the forum. 2 years ago

trvthseeker wrote:

IMO the war is lost. These people created ww1 ww2, controlled ancient Rome. Time to run away.

After researching this shit for the last 15 years, I have had many moments of "What can lil o me do to FIX this crap"

But in the last two years I have never felt more optimistic, so many people are waking up AND asking; What can I do?

In my battle I have recently had people just offer to help out of the blue. Like a private Lawyer who spent 40 hours with me
and on the final he declared I am on your team.

I've always loved a good challenge AND this is the best one could ask for; it's my new sport. :P
Read More...