Tried to get RCMP to enforce this against Fortis when they cut our power but the RCMP would not do it.
and what these landlords need to realize is that they are mere tenants paying all the upkeep and taxes for the real landlord being the province.
Making all laws passed since Queen Victoria's death only ceremonial also.
One other thing Flarehty stated that Canada extended westward only to the Rockies. He told the truth but no one paid attention but the ruling in the land claims of natives in British Columbia showed that the Natives never ceded their territory to the British so British Columbia can not be part of Canada as British Columbia is still Native land.
So how has asking for the BNA Act lodged in the parliament of Great Britain worked out for you. If you read the copies that are available as of the death of Queen Victoria there is no monarchy in Canada so since then all statute and regulation are void from the beginning.
Mortgages are based in fraud from the get go if one has purchased property with an existing mortgage. This was admitted to me by a Real Estate agent with the reasoning that it is just the way it's done. And how it's done is if there is a mortgage on the property one is purchasing that existing mortgage must be cleared before issuance of another mortgage. This is done by a fraudulent undisclosed paper shuffle. So in reality the Bank actually paid off the mortgage then basically has given a mortgage on their property. It's kinda like a rent to own agreement that you have entered into.
Securitizing mortgages may not be as prevalent as in the US but it is permitted with limits apparently.
Why does the CMHC want to cap the amount of mortgage debt it will insure?
The Canadian real estate market has enjoyed a record boom over the last decade, even through the recession. But government officials started to show concerns early last year about an overheated housing market – driven by cheap credit conditions— which could lead to a correction, or decline in sales volumes and prices.
Finance Minister Jim Flaherty has taken steps to rein in home lending by scaling back eligible loans the CMHC will insure. The CMHC has cut amortization periods on insured mortgages from 40 years back down to 25, forcing higher down payments, and nixed government insurance altogether on million-dollar properties.
The latest move came last week, when CMHC notified lenders it is capping how much insured mortgage debt they are allowed to bundle up or “securitize” into tradable investments. The mortgage-backed securities are then sold off to investors.
Analysts say the latest move will reduce appetite among banks to lend beyond that threshold (still $350 million a month per institution). The move also reduces the risk of taxpayers being left on the hook for losses incurred on insured mortgages, as this Ratehub.ca post points out.
So the seal is 2 for 2.
Unless a debt exists fiat currency does not have to be accepted for payment. The seller can demand any form of payment they desire from the buyer. The promise to pay is the money as fiat currency is also only a promise to pay. In fact Bank of Canada notes are first lien against the assets of the Bank of Canada. There is not enough, only about 60Billion give or take a bit, Bank of Canada notes in circulation to pay the debts so this means most debt is paid by promises to pay.
The only name I recognize is Harriet Nahanee who was jailed at the same time as Betty Krawczyk for contempt of court. Betty pleaded with the court not to jail Harriet because she was ill but to no avail. Harriet died shortly after being jailed from complications of her illness. She survived the residential schools but was finally silenced by the justice system.
Shoot the messenger when not wanting to or fearing to hear the message.
Dean is a rip off artist? Please provide evidence of who's head he held a gun to or whatever threat or coercion Dean used to get people to donate to a closed forum or seminar?
He has consistently told people to do as I say not as I do. He has told people to keep their driver's licence to avoid confrontation with police that might land them in jail. He has told people to pick their own cause to fight for and stick to it. He has told people to not just go out and jeopardize their homes and family.
He is striving to get the justice system to abide by its own law. It appears it is so corrupted that it can not even be seen as a justice system any longer.
He said on a radio show he was on, if memory serves me correct with Rick Simpson, that he would be growing a crop of medicinal hemp on his farm. He walks the talk and I believe he is doing what he does to help bring law back to this country along with our right to choose how we cure our illness and how we live our lives.
The weapons were mostly lawful to possess in Canada and the others being the hand guns are a rule of Canada not a law. The so called illegal guns were not being carried by him and were not being used for any harmful activity. No victim no crime.
Right or wrong in his method I for one admire his ability to stick to his convictions even while being unlawfully caged for standing up against the corruption of the so called justice system.
If(the illusive if) everyone would do the same instead of cowering to the perceived authority of the so called justice system it would collapse under its own corruption.
Alas there are those that do, those that think about doing, those that do nothing, and those that do nothing and disparage those that do while doing nothing themselves except complain about a system designed to rape them of all their value.
Lead, follow, or get the fuck out of the way.
My goal also is for the system, if they require us to follow their rules as I have been told by them I must do while in BC or Canada, to follow and apply their own rules equally upon themselves as they are applied upon us.
Is this goal unrealistic and if one chooses to support a man or organization that is of the same mind set does that make that man or organization a rip off artist for being the recipient of ones voluntarily donation or gift. Unlike government who requires one to donate to its cause under threat of jail or possibly death for refusing I for one prefer to support or not support whom ever I choose.
I would hope in the land of freedom choice and association is the case as everyone has a right to choose who and to what causes one aligns oneself with. Corrupt government, corrupt judiciary, and corrupt big corporations that spread death and destruction are not those I choose to fund or align with and also choose not to support or align with those that support those corrupt entities.
Dean has given no grant and no cause of action has been presented. Corrupt to the core. It is incumbent on all people who choose freedom to go to the wall each and every time we are required to attend their courts and be willing to fill their jails if necessary. No other approach will suffice as it will be business as usual for them and a continued raping for us.
My approach has been to try and get those in authority to provide evidence of their authority and provide the meaning of Acts and Statutes and have been largely ignored with the parroting of “ we can not provide legal advice “
My conclusion is that one need not follow any Act or Statute as it is an impossibility if one is unable to get a meaningful response when requesting a clear meaning of the words in those Acts and Statutes.
Anyway I will await the final outcome to Dean’s endeavour with anticipation that remedy is indeed possible in the corrupt judicial system of this so called land of free men and free institutions called Canada.