TAZER NAZI SUING CBC
CC: TWIMC
Dear Fine Folks at the CBC and other Canadian people,
Hello and good day. I am commonly known as Robert-Arthur of the Menard family. I am a Freeman-on-the-Land and Interim Director of the World Freeman Society. We are a global organization dedicated to helping create a freer and more abundant world, where authority is not gained with deception and when exercised done so with compassion, restraint, understanding and accountability.
I was recently subjected to a deep sense of disbelief bordering on the surreal when I read in the National Post the following:
VANCOUVER — The Mountie who repeatedly deployed his Taser on Robert Dziekanski at the Vancouver International Airport two years ago has filed a libel lawsuit against the CBC.
Const. Kwesi Millington claims that CBC's coverage of the incident since Nov. 4, 2007, has caused him to suffer "serious embarrassment and distress" and has caused him "public ridicule."
Const. Millington claims CBC's coverage has "seriously injured" his reputation, causing him to seek punitive and aggravated damages against the CBC.
Const. Kwesi Millington claims that CBC's coverage of the incident since Nov. 4, 2007, has caused him to suffer "serious embarrassment and distress" and has caused him "public ridicule."
Const. Millington claims CBC's coverage has "seriously injured" his reputation, causing him to seek punitive and aggravated damages against the CBC.
I am sure he would prefer that you did not bring his unlawful and highly opprobrious actions to light as that is one of the hallmarks of bullies. I am simply astounded at the idea that this man thinks he can do all that he did, and now seek to punish or sanction those who by their vigilance and integrity help to protect us all from the rise of tyranny, oppression and perversions of justice. The idea that a police officer could sue the CBC for covering the unlawful actions of that officer, actions that affect us all so deeply, reflects a level of narcissism and disdain for the public that is shocking and scary. If even a fraction of the police in this country think like he does we could be in for some very serious trouble.
Innocent man with just minutes left to live.
Those words did cause me to ponder however, and as a man of peace who loves remedy and prefers acceptance and redirection over direct conflict, I came to the realization that HE has caused me what he is claiming you have caused him! And furthermore, he has also caused that same harm in just about every Canadian who saw that footage, and felt the burden of responsibility for allowing our police to develop into such thuggish brutes. It was a tragedy very easily avoided, and is a shameful and unwarranted stain on our reputation as a Nation, a People and a Country. It has caused me personally emotional distress; it has caused me to be subjected to serious embarrassment on the world stage; it has deeply damaged the level of trust I had for peace officers; I now feel a reasonable and justified fear every time I see a man with a tamer, er, taser especially a member of the RCMP; it has has eroded my faith in the judicial system and the manner in which they attempt to administrate justice. In short, I think I am in a position to bring legal action to bear against him for his actions on that day and if successful, so will every other Canadian. But why stop there? If I did it would not be in keeping with my philosophy.
I have been looking for an opportunity to bring legal action to bear against one suitable officer for the purpose of educating the rest as to the limits of their authority and in order to entice them to accept their duties with more professionalism and restraint. I think this man with his actions have 'rung my bell', and has apparently volunteered for the position. In fact, I can not think of a more suitable candidate for this action. My position is that gross negligence is equal to fraud, and failure to distinguish between an Act and the law is gross negligence and fraud, and I doubt he has ever made that distinction, and as such, he has been committing fraud his entire career. I believe the proceeds of crime legislation is in fact applicable to the police and government agents, and that is where the proceeds of crime concept comes into play: if he has been acting criminally his entire career, as I think I can prove, then he must forfeit everything he has ever been paid under proceeds of crime legislation. If it is good for the goose, it is good for the gander. I think we should then donate that directly to the people of Poland, along with a huge amount of maple syrup, smoked salmon, wheat, cheddar, and maybe one beaver, as an apology and amends.
Innocent man with seconds left to live.
So, I am curious as to whether you would be interested in doing a story about that same officer who is levelling charges against The Fine Folks at the CBC, facing the same type of charges, but by thousands of Canadians, all of whom either bring class action suit, or sue him individually in small claims court.
This weekend I will be doing some research and studying various options, but I will likely be filing in small claims court here in Vancouver on Monday my action against him. The other thing will require more study, but it is on the to do list. Likely using the power of the Internet, I can find hundreds of people who feel as I do, and are willing to stand for Canada's reputation and initiate lawful legal action against him.
Feel free to contact me using the email or phone number provided if you would like more information.
Sincerely and without malice aforethought, ill will, vexation or frivolity,
I AM
Robert-Arthur: Menard
Freeman-on-the-Land